Meta data in KOS

I was thinking to write about Knowledge Organization System(KOS). Since I am working on the same area.

To start about KOS: We have to know about meta data: simply data about data
Meta data for KOS:

* Name /title
* Acronym
* Owner/Creator
* Language
* Type
* Format
* Note
* Usage
* E-Mail
* Date()
* Souces
* version ( we should keep version controlling so that we can walk through different version if we need sometime).
* Usage/subject cover/ purpose/rating
* Singnature(some time use for security reason).

Here is more details about KOS registry draft:

Ref: http://staff.oclc.org/~vizine/NKOS/Thesaurus_Registry_version3_rev.htm

Different forms of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and their standards:


Dictionaries, glossaries
ISO 12200:1999, Computer applications in terminology--Machine Readable Terminology
Interchange Format (MARTIF)--Negotiated Interchange
ISO 12620:1999, Computer applications in terminology--Data Categories.

Thesauri
ISO 2788-1986(E) / ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993(R1998) (www.niso.org)
ZThes (using Z39.50, strictly ANSI Z39.19)
http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/profiles/zthes-04.html)
Browser at http://muffin.indexdata.dk/zthes/tbrowse.zap
Vocabulary Markup Language (VocML) (under discussion at NKOS)
See also http://ceres.ca.gov/KOS/
ISO 5964-1985(E) (multilingual)
USMARC format for authority data
(http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/authority/ecadhome.html)

Topic maps (reference works, encyclopedias) (http://www.topicmaps.org/about.html)
ISO/IEC 13250:2000 Topic Maps
XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 (http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/)
Concept maps

Classification schemes
USMARC format for classification data
http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/classification/eccdhome.html

Ontologies
Knowledge Interchange Format (KIF) NCITS.T2/98-004
(http://meta2.stanford.edu/kif/dpans.html)
Ontology Markup Language (OML) /
Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML)
(http://www.ontologos.org/OML/CKML-Grammar.html)
Ontology Interface Layer (OIL) (http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/)

Generic standards for knowledge structures, entity-relationship models
Resource Description Framework (RDF) (http://www.w3.org/RDF/)
Metadata Coalition. Open Information Model (OIM). Knowledge Management Model
(http://www.mdcinfo.com/OIM/)
XTM might also fit here

Ref: Dagobert Soergel

If we take example of Thesaurus Registry for KOS: we can defined it in the following way:

* termId
* termName
* term Qualifier
* term Langauge
* term Created Date
* term Modified Date
* term Modified by
* Souce DB

Every group is having own KOS and their presentation system. This structure/standard totally depends on how and what purpose will you use this system.

It has a lot of blessings in vocabulary system or faceted system
But ,It can not currently be utilised to full petential because semantic structure not explicitly represented.

From my point of view , faceted analysis is big research issue now the days. I do believe that if we can present and adapt our ontology in faceted way, we can browse it easily.

I want to hand off my writing now and thinking lots of digital preservation of digital documents.

Preserving digital Memories

Today, I was talking with my friend Imma , she is library management specialist. I was asking her views regarding digital document preservation. She told me that text document are preserved as pdf and visibility is difficult if the file size is large.

This is a hot issue in the semantic web community, how can we preserve the information. For example , dynamic information is very difficult to preserve( satelight picture or audio information ).

This problem is not only semantic web domain but also it covers all the domain. For example, geographic information , natural pictures, videos etc.

The previously, people took picture by analog camera ;developed the pictures and preserve it in the album. But now, we take lots of pictures with digital camera; how many pictures we preserve it. From my experience, I have lost lot of pictures due to my hard disk crash. I will never get those pictures again. Since, I could not back to the time.

Also, people feel good when they remember childhood memory. But, some people can not remember all the things.

Once I asked one researcher from UK about this. Her vision was an electro magnetic chip that will help to remember things. Do we think , it is enough?

Ancient age, People wrote inforamtion in the stone. Professor Kurodo says"Archiving the mountains of digitalised culture heritage we have amassed for the future is paramount"

There are lots initiative taken now the days:
Recently yahoo announced that they will help digitise 18,000 works of American literature plus material from national and European archieves. That will include books, speeches, audio, video and music.

News channel , BBC also maintains archieve
Ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/

University of Trento and Trento city lunched new project "LiveMemory". The main theme of the project is to preserve the city information.

The main problem of preservation is format. There is no unique format for a picture , video, audio or text . Another problem is file size. There are some people offering to put your information or files in the online but I think it is not secured.


According to my views, we can do following things:

• Everybody should agree about the unique format. Example W3 for RDF, OWL, XML
  
• We should start the campaign about "Losing Information in Every Second"through the popular search engines.
• Build an International forum for Digital Information(Pictures forum , Document forum etc)
• Make a digital repository for every city.
  

Intially, It will be very expensive but we should not give up. I am sure that we will invent a small chip that will store a large quatity of information.

My master thesis

Recently, I have got compliments from two persons about my master thesis. I was extremely happy to get it.

I had done my master thesis at KTH, Sweden with my friend Ramanjit Singh. He is very nice guy with a good sense of humor. We started our thesis under Prof. Paul Johannesson and Gudrun Jeppesen Neve. Our teachers was extremely nice and helpful to us. Our thesis was about "Evaluation Ontology Construction tools and Ranking techniques". Intially , we had plan to evaluate ontology construction tools at least 10 but we had not time. Specially me, I had got a PhD position at University of Trento, Italy. I told Prof. Paul about it. He inspired me about PhD and told me that you can do 3 tools evaluations. We worked hard and presented our thesis.

I had always fascination about my thesis. But , I was doing completing different things in my PhD studies. After 2 years ,I forgot about my thesis and the previous work .

When I got a letter from one researcher, UK and another e-mail from a semantic columist, USA. I was wornder and feel extremely good. I wish I could do more research on it. Remembering my beautiful days at KTH.

Library Catalog System

A library catalog system keeps records for al bibliographic items .

Bibliographic items:

• books
• computer files
• graphics
• realia,
  
• cartographic

Before librarian keep their records by using library cards. Still, we can find it some places. After coming to www, people are interested to see any information by internet (you can download or access pdf format of book so that you do not need to go library physically)

History:
AS far I know from history, library catalogues are introduced by in the house of wisdom. Then, there was a big collections of books of 7th and 8th centuray in Iraq during Islamic Renaissance. They used totally different catalogue syem in their library.

Later on , Hulagu khan attacked Iraq and distroyed and burnt all books.

Ref:http://liswiki.org/wiki/History_of_the_card_catalog

Here is some wonderful tools for cataloging
Ref : http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/Catalogs/

Holly Ramadan

Allah has given us lots of things, but we always forget to show our respect/ sacrifices to him. Today is our holly Ramadan. I am praying to God so that I can keep my fasting. Generally people think, you can not do work if you keep your fasting. I, myself believe that I do my best work in Ramadan. Anyway, Back to my thesis writing .

Semantic heterogeneity and factors

I was thinking to write about semantic heterogeneity for a long time. Its big problem for semantic matching purpose. Since my thesis on matching between two controlled vocabulary.

In short , I found some factors for heterogeneity problem:

• Time (Vocabulary changes time-to-time)
• place( after 50 miles , a new language starts, for example , italian langauge of trentino people is different than bolzano people or Distinct language in india for every states).
• cultural diversity( English people say centre , American people say center).
• structure of vocabulary (there is no unique presentation of vocabulary, for example some people use rdf files , some people use xml files)

Heterogeneity problem

• Syntactic heterogeneity
• Terminological heterogeneity(Paper vs Article)
• Conceptual heterogeneity is also called semantic heterogeneity.
  
• Semiotic heterogeneity
  

Is social networking problem?

At night, this question came to my mind whether social networking are good or bad or time consuming? I was thinking to write something on it.


As we know that social networking sites( facebook, myspace, friends, h15) are growing popularity everyday. Is this popular only 15-20 aged people or 21-30 or 31-48 so on . I think that mostly people are aged 17-19 are very crazy for facebook. I had a small research on it. I asked a couple people and found out that they are basically using facebook for making new friend. Guys are poking girls and girls are also watching guys faces and physics. I asked myself , "Is it usful or not useful or time consuming". One sense it is useful , you can make good and new friend. On the hand , it is simply time consuming and u can use this time for other purpose. so it is giving any impact for young people with earlier age.


if you consider the group 21-35 then you can find out that most of people are using to communicate with their school or college or university friends or official colleaguge .I do not support those people who are using or browsing facebook at the office. if you spend 15 min or 20 min everyday on facebook then u can wast 1 h official time. It was new about one official person that he told his boss about sickness but boss saw him in facebook and got angry and fired him from job. This kind of cases are coming now the days. I am not saying you should not use it . I can say that you can use it but you should also respect your official time and work.

I think we should use social network site after official hours. or you can use it as learning or group meeting purpose.

but age group 36- 48 use social network site for finding their old school buddies. They are not so frequent on it. They are happy to see and communicated people.

However, we can make it useful :
1. Teacher can open a page for his course and make open discuss through it.
2. We can make meeting schedule among the group.
3. Publish some useful information so that people can get some knowledge.